Catalyst
Back to repository rankings
DevtoolsUpdated from GitHub

cambridge/thesis

A LaTeX document class that conforms to the Computer Laboratory's PhD thesis formatting guidelines.

22898TeX5590d old

Summary

The available public data is mixed. More sustained activity or a broader contributor base would strengthen the score.

cambridge/thesis recorded 4 commits in the past 30 days, has 15 public contributors, and has averaged 0 stars a day since launch.

67

Repository health

38

Maintainer track record

79

Repository quality

36

Catalyst Score

Contributors

Public track record

cambridge GitHub avatar
cambridge

@cambridge · Repository organization

38/100

This account has a limited public history, so the track-record score is less certain.

4 followers1 public repos15y history0 contributions
1 public repositories4 followers15 years of public history
Matej Urbas GitHub avatar
Matej Urbas

@urbas · Top contributor

89/100

Established maintainer with a long public history and active community.

25 followers112 public repos15y history156 contributions
112 public repositories25 followers15 years of public history
tjiagoM GitHub avatar
tjiagoM

@tjiagoM · Top contributor

64/100

Active maintainer with a growing open-source track record.

26 followers26 public repos12y history16 contributions
26 public repositories26 followers12 years of public history
Steffen Lösch GitHub avatar
Steffen Lösch

@steffenloesch · Top contributor

30/100

This account has a limited public history, so the track-record score is less certain.

0 followers10 public repos12y history6 contributions
10 public repositories0 followers12 years of public history

Score breakdown

How the Catalyst Score was calculated

Star growth since launch+0
Fork growth since launch+0
Freshness+0
30-day commit activity+2
Contributor breadth+9
Maintainer track record+5
Topic activity+4
Repository quality+6
Topic novelty+10
Risk penalty0

Activity

Recent repository activity

4

Commits · 30d

15

Public contributors

0

Lifetime stars/day

0

Pull requests · 90d

Findings

What we found

4 commits in the last 30 days

15 public contributors

0 issues and 0 pull requests opened in 90 days

7 documentation and structure checks passed

Related repositories

devtools · 0 created in the past 30 days

Risk review

What needs watching

No material structural red flags detected; monitor maintainer concentration

Public GitHub data cannot verify private work, employment claims, code security, or identity. Use the track-record score as research context, not proof of identity or trustworthiness.

Growth quality

Recent attention and maintainer concentration

Recent timestamps and contribution patterns help distinguish sustained adoption from a single headline number.

Contributor concentration

Top 15 public contributors

Top contributor share
79%
Top three share
90%
Contributors checked
15
Concentration
High

Shares use the contribution totals reported for the contributors checked, not private or unlinked activity.

Recent commit sample

Latest 100 commits

Unique authors
10
Verified commits
22%
Merge commits
32%
Median time between commits
20.0 hours

Repository footprint

Default branch: master

Repository size
5.8 MB
Branches
1
Tags
0
Watchers
11
WikiGitHub PagesIssue tracking

Deeper GitHub data

Delivery, collaboration, and project readiness

These metrics use the latest public records GitHub makes available for this repository.

Language composition

Share of detected source bytes

TeX95.1%
Makefile4.9%

Community readiness

GitHub community health 50%

README
License
Contributing guide
Code of conduct
Issue template
Pull request template

Pull request health

Latest 50 pull requests

Merge rate
82%
Median merge time
6.7 hours
Open
0
Stale over 30 days
0

Issue health

Latest 20 issues

Closure rate
100%
Median close time
44.1 days
Open
0
Open without replies
0

CI reliability

Latest 9 workflow runs

Success rate
56%
Workflows represented
1
Failed runs
1
Median duration
1.9 min

Last checked

8/25/2026, 8:11:56 PM

Scan another repository